Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence occurred in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video websites that are streaming where viewers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off steam, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these specific devices. Whenever dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He is a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, this is one worker whom keeps their very own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a very man that is quiet. He just strolled in extremely calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time royal vegas casino no deposit codes and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of those two tales is really a bit more frightening, as the axe was wielded not at the slots, but at a member of the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a state of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he did not comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity stated that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm on the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant aided by the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of money,’ and the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While every of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has had its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal choice is regarding the idea that neighboring communities could be affected by casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos ought to be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, happens to be one of the handful of prospects who have suggested that all of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that would be situated in East Boston, as an example.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it would have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one community,’ Conley stated within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and social burdens but get none of the proposed benefits.’
In line with the state laws that produced the chance for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate settlement, with arbitration needed in the event that casinos and local governments can’t arrive at a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed taking a path that isn’t really outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being manufactured by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while nevertheless giving East Boston veto power throughout the whole vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Regardless if voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by the state due to the fact site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing star of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier sports company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the big donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing users of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is one regarding the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the large numbers of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the neighborhood roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’
‘I know there was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with wagering shops and cash advance businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says a very important factor in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very unusual for the politician.
Spared for a Technicality
However, fighting back the corner of the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna claimed that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect with the guidelines and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working office of Chuka Umunna in his ability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
And while Goulden is no more a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether this is a completely innocent donation or not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party may just be looking to destroy the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this type of hard stance against the spread of the industry in their neighborhood constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he certainly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is thought to be a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this season their office was accused of editing their Wikipedia page to exhibit comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.